Accessibility/Universal Design

Lt. Colin A. Kisor, USNR, Using interpreters to assist jurors: a plea for consistency.  22 Chicano-Latino L. Rev. 37 (2001).

Maryann Jones, And access for all: accommodating individuals with disabilities in the California courts. 32 U.S.F. L. Rev. 75 (1997).

Kathleen Pearson, Let's all go to the Dairy Queen without Margo!: the liability of franchisors under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act after Neff v. American Diary Queen Corp. 101 Dick. L. Rev. 137 (1996).

Lee A. Perselay, A hot dog at the ballgame: looking at the physical accessibility of professional baseball stadiums in northern New England. 38 N.H. B.J. 72 (1997).

James N. Spolar, Comment. I hear ya' knockin', so you can come in: the Americans with Disabilities Act limited to physical structures and individualized discrimination under..(Parker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 121 F3d 1006, 6th Cir. 1997, en banc, cert. denied.). 24 J. Corp. L. 105 (1998).
 

Accommodations

Note. Toward a reasonable equality: accommodating learning disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act. 111 Harv. L. Rev. 1560 (1998).

Symposium: Individual rights and reasonable accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act. 46 Depaul L. Rev. 871 (1997).

Suzanne Abram, Student article. Reasonable accommodations for learning-disabled university students under the ADA. 28 J. L. & Educ. 121 (1999).

Jeffrey S. Berenholz, Note. The development of reassignment to a vacant position in the Americans with Disabilities Act. 15 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 635 (1998).

Thomas N. Chirikos, Will the costs of accommodating workers with disabilities remain low? Behav. Sci. & L. 93 (1999).

Phyllis G. Coleman & Robert M. Jarvis, Tuition adjustment for law school students: a necessary accommodation under the ADA? 24 J.C. & J.L. 45 (1997).

Allen Dudley, Comment. Rights to reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act for "regarded as" disabled individuals. 5 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 389 (1999).

Lisa Eichhorn, Reasonable accommodations and awkward compromises: issues concerning learning disabled students and professional schools in the law school context. 26 J. L. & Educ. 31 (1997).

Leslie Goddard, Searching for balance in the ADA; recent developments in the legal and practical issues of reasonable accommodation. 35 Idaho L. Rev. 227 (1999).

Kymberly D. Hankinson, Comment. Navigating between a rock and a hard place: an employer's obligation to reasonably accommodate the disabled in the unionized workplace. 15 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 245 (1998).

J. Freedley Hunsicker, The accommodation of writing disorders in law school: a lawyer's view. 27 J.L. & Educ. 621 (1998).

Pamela S. Karlan & George Rutherglen, Disabilities, discrimination and reasonable accommodation. 46 Duke L. J. 1 (1996).

Jill S. Kingsbury, "Must we talk about that reasonable accommodation?": The Eighth Circuit says yes, but is the answer reasonable? (Fjellstad v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc., 188 F.3d 944, 8th Cir. 1999.)  65 Mo. L. Rev. 967-1002 (2000).

Alex B. Long, A good walk spoiled: Casey Martin and the ADA's reasonable accommodation requirement in competitive settings. 77 Or. L. Rev. 1337 (1998).

William J. McDevitt, Seniority systems and the Americans with Disabilities Act: the fate of "reasonable accommodation" after Eckles. 9 St. Thomas L. Rev. 359 (1997).

Michael D. Moberly, Letting Katz out of the bag: the employer's duty to accommodate perceived disabilities. 30 Ariz. L. Rev. 603 (1998).

Frances M. Nicastro, The Americans with Disabilities Act:determining which learning disabilities qualify for reasonable accommodations.  26 J. Legis. 355 (2000).

Laura F. Rothstein, The employer's duty to accommodate performance and conduct deficiencies of individuals with mental impairments under disability discrimination laws. 47 Syracuse L. Rev. 931 (1997).

Estella J. Schoen, Does the ADA make exceptions in a unionized workplace? the conflict between the reassignment provision of the ADA and collectively bargained seniority systems. 82 Minn. L. Rev. 1391 (1998).

Robert L. Schonfeld, "Reasonable accommodation" under the Federal Fair Housing Amendments Act. 25 Fordham Urb. L.J. 413 (1998).

Alan D. Schuchman, Note. The holy and the handicapped: an examination of the different applications of the reasonable accommodation clauses in Title VII and the ADA. 73 Ind. L.J. 745 (1998).

Sam Silverman, The ADA interactive process: the employer and employee's duty to work together to identify a reasonable accommodation is more than a game of five card stud. 77 Neb. L. Rev. 281 (1998).

Belinda Spaeth, AKA v. Washington Hospital Center and Kralik v. Durbin: Is it "reasonable" to require an employer to accommodate an ADA plaintiff when doing so violates the collectively bargained seniority rights of other employees? 42 St. Louis U. L.J. 989 (1998).

James J. Weisman, Dignity and non-discrimination: the requirement of "reasonable accommodation" in disability law. 23 Fordham Urban L.J. 1235 (1996).

W. Ray Williams, Hand-up or handout? The Americans with Disabilities Act and "unreasonable accommodation" of learning disabled bar applicants: toward a new paradigm.   Creighton L. Rev. 611 (2001).

Matthew Graham Zagrodzky, When employees become disabled: does the Americans with Disabilities Act require consideration of a transfer as a reasonable accommodation? 38 S. Tex. L. Rev. 939 (1997).
 

ADA Jurisprudence

Alsbrook v. City of Maumelle:  WIll the conservative Supreme Court decide that the Eleventh Amendment shields state and local governments from the Americans with Disabilities Act?  10 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 265 (2000).

Bragdon v. Abbott: A case of HIV as perceived disability under the Americans With Disabilities Act. 73 St. John's L. Rev. 933 (1999).

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: an analysis of Title III and applicable case law. 29 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 1117 (1995).

John Christopher Anderson, Three generations later and still no class: protecting Americans with disabilities under 42 U.S.C. section 1985 (3), the Ku Klux Klan Act. 47 Drake L. Rev. 537 (1999).

Harry Beatty, Ontario disability support program: policy and implementation. 14 J. L. & Soc. Pol'y 1 (1999).

Anne E. Beaumont, This estoppel has got to stop: judicial estoppel and the Americans with Disabilities Act. 71 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1529 (1996).

Stephen F. Befort & Holly Lindquist Thomas, The ADA in turmoil: judicial dissonance, the Supreme Court's response and the future of disability discrimination law. 78 Ore. L. Rev. 27 (1999).

Lawrence Berliner, A survey of significant ADA Title II and Title III decisions within the second circuit. 15 QLR 537 (1996).

Lawrence Berliner, An evolving Americans with Disabilities Act, a survey of decisions involving public entities and places of public accommodation from courts within the Second Circuit. 17 QLR 633 (1998).

Josh Bernstein, The efforts of Texas courts to disable disability law in Texas. 2 Tex. F. on Civ. Lib. & Civ. Rts. 43 (1995).

William Booth, Student article. Survival under the ADA: the federal common law standard for determining survival claims. 2 DePaul J. Health Care L. 269 (1998).

Pamela Brandwein & Richard K. Scotch, The gender analogy in the disability discrimination literature.  62 Ohio St. L.J. 465 (2001).

Charles D. Brown, Congressional abrogation of Eleventh Amendment immunity by passing the ADEA & ADA. 51 Baylor L. Rev. 339 (1999).

William Cain, Jr., The "most integrated setting" regulation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 34 Ark. Law. 8 (1999).

Sandra J. Carnahan, The Americans with Disabilities Act in state correctional institutions. 27 Cap. U. L. Rev. 291 (1999).

James P. Colgate, If you build it, can they sue? Architects' liability under Title III of the ADA. 58 Fordham L. Rev. 137 (1999).

Ruth Colker & James J. Brudney, Dissing Congress.  100 Mich. L. Rev. 80 (2001).

Nancy Lawler Dickhute, Jury duty for the blind in the time of reasonable accommodations: the ADA's interface with a litigant's right to a fair trail. 32 Creighton L. Rev. 849 (1999).

Lisa Eichhorn, Applying the ADA to mitigating measures cases: a choice of statutory evils. 31 Ariz. S. L. Rev. 1071 (1999).

Keith R. Fentonmiller & Hebert Semmel, Where age and disability discrimination intersect: an overview of the ADA for the ADEA practitioner.  10 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 227 (2000).

Leanne Mashburn Foster, Note. Asymptomatic HIV-infection and its place within the Americans with Disabilities Act after...(Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S. Ct. 2196, 1998.) 43 St. Louis U. L.J. 177 (1999).

Jonathan C. Fritts, Note. "Down in front!": judicial deference, regulatory interpretation, and the ADA's line of sight standard. 86 Geo. L.J. 2653 (1998).

Jeffrey Gerish, Abandoning congressional intent: modern-day applications of the ADA. 1997 Det. C. L. Rev. 805 (1997).

Michael H. Gottesman, Disability, federalism, and a court with an eccentric mission.  62 Ohio St. L.J. 31 (2001).

Thomas P. Guarino, IDEA and ADA - do the exhaustion requirements of 20 U.S.C. § 1415 apply to actions under the ADA? 15 Glendale L. Rev. 1 (1996).

Roger C. Hartley, Enforcing federal civil rights against public entities after Garrett.  28 J.C. & U.L. 41 (2001).

Roger C. Hartley, The new federalism and the ADA; State sovereign immunity from private damage suits after Boern. 24 Rev. L. & Soc. Change 481 (1998).

Kimberly Horvath, Does Bragdon v. Abbott provide the missing link for infertile couples seeking protection under ADA? 4 DePaul J. Health Care L. 819 (1999).

Mark A. Johnson, Note.  A flawed standard yields a predictable result. (Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, 121 S. Ct. 955, 2001.)  60 Md. L. Rev. 393 (2001).

Michelle R. King & Beth S. Herr, The consequences and implications of a case-by-case analysis under the Americans with Disabilities Act for asymptomatic HIV-positive gay men and lesbians post Bragdon. 8 Law & Sexuality: Rev. Lesbian Gay Bisexual & Transgender Legal Issues 531 (1998).

Catherine J. Lanctot, Ad hoc decision making and per se prejudice: how individualizing the determination of "disability" undermined the ADA. 42 Vill. L. Rev. 327 (1997).

James Leonard, A damaged remedy: disability discrimination claims against state entities under the Americans with Disabilities Act after Seminole Tribe and Flores. 41 Ariz. L. Rev. 651 (1999).

James Leonard, The shadows of unconstitutionality: how the new federalism may affect the anti-discrimination mandate of the Americans with Disabilities Act.  52 Ala. L. Rev. 91 (2000).

S. Elizabeth Wilborn Malloy, Something borrowed, something blue: why disability law clains are different.  33 Comm. L. Rev. 603 (2001).

Arlene B. Mayerson, Restoring regard for the "regarded as" prong: giving effect to congressional intent. 42 Vill. L. Rev. 587 (1997).

Paul Steven Miller, The Americans with Disabilities Act in Texas: the EEOC's continuing efforts in enforcement. 34 Hous. L. Rev. 777 (1997).

Paul Steven Miller, EEOC's enforcement of the ADA in the Second Circuit. 48 Syracuse L. Rev. 1577 (1998).

Paul Steven Miller, The EEOC's enforcement of the Americans with Disabilities Act in the Sixth Circuit. 48 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 217 (1998).

Christopher S. Morin, Flying the not-so-friendly skies: Charas v. TWA's definition of "service" under the ADA's preemption clause exposes airlines to tort liability.  65 J. Air L. & Com. 497 (2000 ).

Sarah N. Otwell, Note. Triumph for the working disabled or hollow procedural device? (Cleveland v. Policy Management Sys. Corp., 119 S. Ct. 15797, 1999.)  3 J. Health Care & Pol'y 452 (2000).

Todd Pauls, Note. Asymptomatic HIV, reproduction, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: the disability dilemma in...(Bragdon v. Abbott, 912 F. Supp. 580, D. Me. 1997, aff'd, 107 F. 3.d 934, 1st Cir. 1997, aff'd, 118 S. Ct. 2196, 1998.). 22 Hamline L. Rev. 633 (1999).

Jessica Perry, Confessions of mentally retarded juveniles and the validity of Miranda rights waiver. 37 Brandeis L. J. (1998).

Robinson, Robert A. Will the conservative Supreme Court decide that the Eleventh Amendment shields state and local governments from the Americans with Disabilities Act? (Alsbrook v. City of Maumelle, 184 F. 3d 999, 8^th Cir. 199, cert. granted, see also Alsbrook v. Arkansas, 120 S. Ct. 1003, 2000, cert. Dismissed, 120 S. Ct. 1265, 2000.). 10 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 265 (2000).

Pamela J. Simmons, Does the end justify the means? the Fourth Circuit's new case-by-case analysis of an HIV-infected plaintiff's ADA claim after Bragdon v. Abbott. 34 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1251 (1999).

Jefferson D.E, Smith & Steve P. alandrillo, Forward to fundamental alteration:  Addressing ADA Title II integration lawsuits after Olmstead v L.C.  24 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 695 (2001).

Robert L. Strayer II, Asserting the Seventh Amendment: an argument for the right to a jury trial when only back pay is sought under the Americans with Disabilities Act. 52 Vand. L. Rev. 795 (1999).

Carrie A. Thornton, Comment.  Alcoholism and the ADA: divergent treatment by the federal courts.  54 SMU L. Rev. 2153 (2001).

Karen M. Volkman, Comment. The limits of coverage: do insurance policies obtained through an employer and administered by insurance companies fall within the scope of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act? 43 St. Louis U. L. J. 249 (1999).

Rebecca Hanner White, Deference and disability discrimination  99 Mich. L. Rev. 532 (2000).

Jessica Lynne Wilson, Technology as panacea: why pregnancy-related problems would be defined without regard to mitigating measures under the ADA. 52 Vand. L. Rev. 831 (1999).
 

Community Based Care/Assisted Living
 

Andrew I. Batavia, A right to personal assistance services: "most integrated setting appropriate" requirements and the independent living model of long-term care.  27 Am. J.L. & Med. 17 (2001).

Melinda Bird, The integration of the ADA and the problem of de-institutionalization. 31 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 847 (1998).

Melissa Bowman, Open debate over closed doors: the effect of the new developmental disabilities regulations on protection and advocacy programs. 85 Ky. L.J. 955 (1996).

Patricia A. Carlton, Note. The Americans with Disabilities Act and child care centers: providing personal care attendants so children with disabilities may benefit from the Act. 23 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 1007 (1998).

Michael J. Davis & Karen L. Gaus, Protecting group homes for the non-handicapped: zoning in the post-Edmonds era. 46 U. Kan. L. Rev. 777 (1998).

Jane Perkins & Randolph Boyle, Addressing long waits for home and community-based care through Medicaid and the ADA.  45 St. Louis U. L.J 117-143 (2001).

Michael L. Perlin, "Their promises of paradise": will Olmstead v. L.C. resuscitate the constitutional "least restrictive alternative" principle in mental disability law?  37 Hous. L. Rev. 999-1054 (2000).

Jefferson D.E. Smith & Steve P. Calandrillo, Forward to fundamental alteration: addresing ADA Title III integration lawsuits after Olmstead v. L.C.  24 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 695 (2001).

Steven J. Snyder, Providing services to assisted living facility residents through home health agencies: meeting the need in changing times. 8 J. Affordable Housing & Commun. Dev. L. 159 (1999).

Loretta Williams, Note.  Long term care after Olmstead v L.C.: wil the potential of the ADA's integration mandate be achieved? (Olmstead v. L.C. ex rel. Zimring, 527 U.S. 581, 1999.)  17 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 205 (2000).

Lucille D. Wood, Note. Costs and the right to community-based treatment. 16 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 501 (1998).

Sandra L. Yue, A return to institutionalization despite Olmstead v. L.C.?  The inadequancy of Medicaid provider reimbursement in Minnesota and the failure to deliver home-and community-based waiver services.  19 Law & Ineq. 307 (2001).
 
 

Crime

Deborah W. Denno, Sexuality, rape and mental retardation. 1997 U. Ill. L. Rev. 315 (1997).

William J. Edwards, Capital punishment and mental disability: amici curiae brief in Penry v. Johnson. 12 Crim. L. F. 267 (2001).

James D. Johnson, Note.  Does the Americans with Disabilities Act apply to the conduct of law enforcement officers pursuant to arrests?  A survey of (Gorman v. Bartch, 925 F. Supp. 653, W.D. Mo. 1996).  14 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 901 (1998).

James D. Johnson, Note. Does the Americans with Disabilities Act apply to the conduct of law enforcement officers pursuant to arrests? A survey of (Gorman v. Bartch, 925 F. Supp. 653, W.D. Mo. 1996). 14 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 901 (1998).

Oliver Kaufman, Note.  Is executing the mentally retarded constitutional?  (Atkins v. Virginia, 2001 U.S. Lexis 5463, Oct 1, 2001.)  85 Marq. L. Rev. 579 (2001).

Grant H. Morris, Placed in purgatory: conditional release of insanity acquittees. 39 Ariz. L. Rev. 1061 (1997).

Margaret M. Severson, Moving beyond case law: suggestions for dealing with the mentally ill offender. 5 J. L. Soc. & Soc. Work 121 (1995).
 

Defenses and Remedies
 

Jennifer N. Coffin, Case note. Civil rights--Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Americans with Disabilities Act--HIV-infected health care workers and the "direct threat" defense. (Estate of Mauro v. Borgess Medical Center, 137 F. 3d 398, 6th Cir., cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 51, 1998.). 66 Tenn. L. Rev. 311 (1998).

Ruth Colker, Winning and losing under the ADA  62 Ohio St. L.J. 239 (2001).

Ruth Colker, The Americans with Disabilities Act: a windfall for defendants. 34 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 99 (1999).

Patrick G. Coy & Timothy M. Hedeen, Disabilities and mediation readiness in court-referred cases: developing screening criteria and service networks. 16 Mediation Q. 113 (1998).

Karen M. Doore, Note. Survival of the fittest? Waiting out the death of the plaintiff in ADA claims. (Allred v. Solaray, Inc., 971 F. Supp. 1394, D. Utah 1997.). 1998 Utah L. Rev. 371 (1998).

Andrea Christensen Luby, Note. Estopping enforcement of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 13 J. L. & Pol. 415 (1997).

Armen H. Merjian, Bad decisions make bad decisions: Davis, Arline, and improper application of the undue financial burden defense under the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. 65 Brooklyn L. Rev. 105 (1999).

Grant H. Morris, Defining dangerousness: risking a dangerous definition. 10 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 61 (1999).

Sabra McDonald Owens, Student article. The multiple personality disorder (MPD) defense. 8 Md. J. Contemp. Legal Issues 237 (1997).

Sabra McDonald Owens, Note. Diagnostic evidence admissibility and the multiple personality disorder defense. 1 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 236 (1998).

Marney Collins Sims, Comment. Estop it! judicial estoppel and its use in Americans with Disabilities Act litigation. 34 Hous. L. Rev. 843 (1997).

Sarah Starnes, Note. Psychiatric disabilities & the ADA: an analysis of conventional defenses & EEOC guidelines. 18 Rev. Litig. l81 (1999).

Robert L Strayer, III, Asserting the Seventh Amendment: an argument for the right to a jury trial when only back pay is sought under the Americans with Disabilities Act. 52 Vand. L. Rev. 795 (1999).

James Schwellenbach, Comment.  Mixed messages: an analysis of the conflicting standards used by the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals when awarding compensatory education for a violation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.  53 Me. L. Rev. 245 (2001).

Deborah L. Slowata, Quantifying a direct threat: risks that health care providers must take while treating infectious patients.  (Bragdon v. Abbot, 524 U.S. 624, 1998)  20 Pace L. Rev. 569 (2000).

Von Rohr, Hilary, Recent development. Lactation litigation and the ADA solution: a response to Martinex v. NBC. 4 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 341 (2000).

Defining Disability/Major Life Activities

Notes: Runnebaum v. NationsBank of Maryland: asymptomatic HIV finds no refuge in the Fourth Circuit's workplace. 8 Temple Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 243 (1998).

Sensitivity training: multiple chemical sensitivity and the ADA. 25 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 485.

Christiana M. Ajalat, Recent development. Is HIV really a "disability"?: The scope of the Americans with Disabilities Act after...(Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S. Ct. 2196, 1998.) 22 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 751 (1999).

Erin Argo, Employment law-Americans with Disabilities Act-corrective and mitigating measures shall be considered in determining whether individual is disabled under ADA. 69 Miss. L. J. 561 (1999).

Leonard J. Augustine, Jr., Note. Disabling the relationship between intentional discrimination and compensatory damages under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 66 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 592 (1998).

Stacie E. Barhorst, What does disability mean: the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 in the aftermath of Sutton, Murphy, and Albertsons 48 Drake L. Rev. 137 (1999).

Erin K. Barta, Note.  Practical effects of the Sutton decision: mitigation, deference, and the EEOC. (Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 119 S. Ct. 2139, 2146, 1999.)  7 Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev. 35 (2000)

Stephanie Beige, Note.  The Supreme Court "substantially limits" the Americans with Disabilities Act. (Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 u.S. 475, 1999.).  16 Touro L. Rev. 1441 (2000).

Nora Belanger, Case note.  The ADA--a practitioner's guide in the aftermath of..(Sutton v. United Air Lines, 527 U.S. 471, 1999.)  21 Pace L. Rev. 271 (2000).

Paula E. Berg, III, Legal: Interrogating the meaning and function of the category of disability in antidiscrimination law. 18 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 1 (1999).

Timothy Stewart Bland, The determination of disability under the ADA: should mitigating factors such as medications be considered? 35 Idaho L. Rev. 265 (1999).

Mary Anne Bobinski, The expanding domain of the ADA: The Supreme Court's decision in Abbott v. Bragdon. 61 Tex. B.J. 918 (1998).

Jonathan Bridges, Note. Mitigating measures under the Americans with Disabilities Act: interpretation and deference in the judicial process. 74 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1061 (1999).

Robert L. Burgdorf, Jr., "Substantially limited" protection from disability discrimination: the special treatment model and misconstructions of the definition of disability. 42 Vill. L. Rev. 409 (1997).

Michael D. Carlis & Scott A. McCabe, Comment. Are there no per se disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act? the fate of asymptomatic HIV disease. 57 Md. L. Rev. 558 (1998).

Emily J. Carton, Comment. Lethal but not disable?--The Circuits split on ADA coverage of the asymptomatic HIV-positive victim. 103 Dick. L. Rev. 129 (1998).

Elizabeth C. Chambers, Asymptomatic HIV as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act. 73 Wash. L. Rev. 403 (1998).

Elizabeth A. Chang, Note. Who should have it both ways?: The role of mitigating measures in an ADA analysis. 64 Brook. L. Rev. 1123 (1998).

Carolyn V. Counce, Note. Corrective devices and nearsightedness under the ADA. 28 U. Mem. L. Rev. 1195 (1998).

Elizabeth A. Crawford, Comment. The courts' interpretations of a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act: are they keeping our promise to the disabled? 35 Hous. L. Rev. 1207 (1998).

Christine Spinella Davis, Comment. Asymptomatic HIV under the ADA: the invisible, yet legitimate disability. 15 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 357 (1998).

Mark S. Dichter & Sarah E. Sutor, The new genetic age: do our genes make us disabled individuals under the Americans with Disabilities Act? 42 Vill. L. Rev. 613 (1997).

Matthew Diller, Dissonant disability policies: the tensions between the Americans with Disabilities Act and Federal Disability Benefit programs. 76 Tex. L. Rev. 1003 (1998).

Kelly Druten, Comment. The Family and Medical Leave Act: what is a serious health condition? 46 U. Kan. L. Rev. 183 (1998).

Lisa Eichhorn, Major litigation activities regarding major life activities: the failure of the "disability" definition in the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. 77 N.C. L. Rev 1405 (1999).

Stephanie A. Fishman, Note.  Individuals with disabilities but without mitigating measures.  46 Wayne L. Rev. 2013 (2000).

Stephanie C. Flores, Note.  Reading the ADA with 20/20 vision: anti-discrimination protection for individuals with corrective disabilities after..(Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 1999.).  22 Whittier L. Rev. 909 (2001).

John Gibeaut, Filling a need. 83 ABA J. 48 (1997).

Brian R. Gin, Genetic discrimination: Huntington's disease and the Americans with Disabilities Act. 97 Colum. L. Rev. 1406 (1997).

Leah Guidry, Note. To heal another or to protect oneself?: HIV under the ADA in light of Bragdon v. Abbott. 15 Touro L. Rev. 805 (1999).

Kristina M. Hall, Note. Enforcing equal protection rights by designating infertility as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (Pacourek v. Inland Steel Co., Inc., 916 F. Supp. 797, N.D. Ill. 1996.). 11 BYU J. Pub. L. 287 (1997).

Matthew C. Hans, Lake v. Arnold: the disabled and the confused jurisprudence of 42 U.S.C. 1985(3). 15 J. Cont. Health L. & Pol'y 673 (1999).

Erica Worth Harris, Controlled impairments under the Americans with Disabilities Act: a search for the meaning of disability. 73 Wash. L. Rev. 575 (1998).

Thais Hernandez, An application of the Chevron doctrine to the EEOC's interpretation of the ADA: why mitigating measures must be considered when evaluating a disability. U. Miami Bus. L. Rev. 309 (1999).

Barbara Hoffman, Reports of its death were greatly exaggerated: the EEOC regulations that define "disability" under the ADA after Sutton v United Air Lines.  9  Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 253 (2000).

Sara Gagne Holmes, Case note.  The Supreme Court reverses the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's directive that disability determinations should be made without regard to mitigating measures. (Sutton v United Airlines, 199 S. Ct. 2139, 1999.)  52 Me. L. Rev. 426 (2000).

Jeremy Holt, Reasonable accommodation: who should bear the burden? 28 Stetson L. Rev. 1229 (1999).

Kimberly Horvath, Does Bragdon v. Abbott provide the missing link for infertile couples seeking protection under the ADA? 2 DePaul J. Health Care L. 819 (1999).

Timothy D. Johnston, Reproduction is not a major life activity: implications for HIV infection as per se disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act. 85 Cornell L. Rev. 189 (1999).

Michelle Kaemmerling, Note. ADA protection for individuals with asymptomatic HIV. (Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S. Ct. 2196, 1998.). 77 N.C. L. Rev. 1266 (1999).

Sheryl Rebecca Kamholz, Note. The Americans with Disabilities Act: advocating judicial deference to the EEOC's mitigating measures guidelines. 8 B.U. Pub. Interest L.J. 99 (1998).

Deborah Kaplan, The definition of disability: perspective of the disability community.  3 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 352 (2000).

Jane M. Keenan, A Social Security claimant's statement that she is disabled and unable to work does not necessarily preclude a subsequent ADA wrongful termination claim. (Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corporation, 119 S. Ct. 1597, 1999).  38 Duq. L. Rev. 685-704 (2000).

Rebecca Kesler, Note. Running in circles: defining mental illness and dangerousness in the wake of Kansas v. Hendricks. 44 Wayne L. Rev. 1871 (1999).

Amy M. Kimmel, Note. Insulin: can't be disabled with it--can't live without it.  52 Hastings L.J 749 (2001).

Michelle R. King & Beth S. Herr, The consequences and implications of a case-by-case analysis under the Americans with Disabilities Act for asymptomatic HIV-positive gay men and lesbians post Bragdon. 8 L. & Sexuality 531 (1998).

Jane Byeff Korn, Cancer and the ADA: rethinking disability.  74 Cal. L. Rev.  399 (2001).

Jane Byeff Korn, Fat, explores whether obesity should be considered a disability under ADA. 77 B.U. L. Rev. 25 (1997).

Barbara L. Kramer, Hayes and Mobley: bridging the definition of disability under the Ohio Worker's Compensation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. 45 Clev. St. L. Rev. 733 (1997).

Todd Lebowitz, Note. Evaluating purely reproductive disorders under the Americans with Disabilities Act. 96 Mich. L. Rev. 724 (1997).

Carolee Kvoriak Lezuch, Note. The Americans with Disabilities Act: redefining "major life activity" to protect the mentally disabled. 44 Wayne L. Rev. 1839 (1999).

Michael T. Mann, Casenote. Defining a "disability" under the Americans with Disabilities Act--corrective measures as a factor. (Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 119 S. Ct. 2139, 1999.)  69 U. Cin. L. Rev. 385 (2000).

Robert C. Mathes, Case note. Civil rights--the status of persons infected with asymptomatic HIV under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 after Bragdon: did the Supreme Court miss an opportunity to protect disabled Americans? (Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S. Ct. 1196, 1998.). 34 Land & Water L. Rev. 237 (1999).

Connie Mayer, Is HIV a disability under the Americans withDisabilities Act:  Unanswered questions after Bragdon v. Abbott.  14 J.L. & Health 179 (1999).

William J. McDevitt, Defining the term "disability" under the Americans with Disabilities Act. 10 St. Thomas L. Rev. 281 (1998).

Catherine Meriano, Casenote.  Disability defined as the burden shifts. (Cleveland v. Poly Management Systems Corp., 526 U.S. 795, 1999.)  20 QLR 323 (2000)

Michael P. Milton, Note. Should drug and alcohol addictions be compensable disabilities under the NFL Player Retirement Plan? An analysis of the Sweeney case. (Sweeney v. Bert Bell/NFL Player Retirement Plan, 961 F. Supp. 1381, S.D. Cal. 1997.). 5 Sports Law. J. 205 (1998).

Jonathan R. Mook, Perspective-Bragdon v. Abbott - pushing the envelope on the definition of "disability." 11 Benefits L. J. 7 (1998).

Katie Cook Morgan, Comment. Should infertility be a covered disability under the ADA?: a question for Congress, not the courts. 65 U. Cin. L. Rev. 963 (1997).

Christine Neylon O'Brien, To tell the truth: should judical estoppel preclude Americans with Disabilities Act complaints? 73 St. John's L. Rev. 349 (1999).

Sarah Lynn Oquist, Casenote. Reproduction constitutes a "major life activity" under the ADA: implications of the Supreme Court's decision in...(Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S. Ct. 2196, 1998.). 32 Creighton L. Rev 1357 (1999).

Beth Hensley Orwick, Note. "Bartender, I'll have a beer and a disability"; alcoholism and the Americans with Disabilities Act: affirming the inmportance of the individualized inquiry in determining the definition of disability.  20 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 195 (2001).

Ashley L. Pack, Note.  The Americans with Disabilities Act after Sutton v. UnitedAir Lines--can it live up to its promise of freedom for disabled Americans? (Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 1999.)  89 Ky. L. J. 539 (1000).

Wendy E. Parmet, Individual rights and class discrimination: the fallacy of an individualized deternmination of disability.  9 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 283 (2000).

Todd Pauls, Asymptomatic HIV, reproduction, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: the disability dilemma in Bragdon v. Abbott. 22 Hamline L. Rev. 633 (1999).

Michael J. Puma, Note. Respecting the plain language of the ADA: a textualist argument rejecting the EEOC's analysis of controlled disabilities. 67 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 123 (1998).

Mark C. Rahdert, Arline's ghost: some notes on working as a major life activity under the ADA.  9 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 303 (2000).

Frank S. Ravitch and Marsha B. Freeman, The Americans with "certain" Disabilities Act: Title I of the ADA and the Supreme Court's result oriented jurisprudence.  77 Denv. U.L. Rev. 199 (1999).

Jamie C. Ray and Stephen S. Pennington, The substantial limitation approach to defining disability: why does it create an insurmountable barrier to individuals who are regarded as disabled?  9 Temp. Pol. & Cov. Rts. L. Rev. 333 (2000)

Amy C. Reeder, Casenote. Is asymptomatic HIV a per se disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act? (Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S. Ct. 2196, 1998.) 50 Mercer L. Rev. 631 (1999).

Kalyani Robbins, Not disabled enough: the ADA's "major life activity" definition of disability. Stanford L. Rev. 171 (1999).

Gary L. Ruckelshaus, Casenote. Fourteenth Amendment & 42 U.S.C. section 12182 (Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S. Ct. 2196, 1998.). 9 Seton Hall Const. L. J. 241 (1998).

Reed L. Russell, Arguing for more principled decision making in deciding whether an individual is substantially limited in the major life activity of working under the ADA. 47 Cath. U. L. Rev. 1057 (1998).

Peter K. Rydel, Redefining the right to reproduce: asserting infertility as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act. 62 Albany L. Rev. 593 (1999).

Allison A. Satchwill, Casenote. Asymptomatic HIV and the Americans with Disabilities Act. (Runnebaum v. Nationsbank of Maryland, N.A., 123 F.3d 156, 4th Cir. 1997.). 66 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1387 (1998).

Shorge Sato, Note.  A little bit disabled: intertility and the Americans with Disabilities Act. (Saks v. Franklin Covey, 119 F. Supp. 2d 318, S.D.N.Y. 200.).  5 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Puib. Pol'y 189 (2001).

Theresa A. Schneider, Note. Stretching the limits of the ADA: asymptomatic HIV-positive status as a disability in...(Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S. Ct. 2196, 1998.). 77 Neb. L. Rev. 206 (1998).

Kathleen M. Sheil, Note. The Americans with Disabilities Act: are your wrists protected? 23 J. Corp. L. 325 (1998).

William Brent Shellhorse, The untenable stricture: pre-mitigation measurement serves to deny protection under the American with Disabilities Act. 4 Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev. 177 (1998).

Thomas Simmons, The ADA prima facie plaintiff: a critical overview of Eighth Circuit Case Law. 47 Drake L. Rev. 761 (1999).

Thomas Simmons, "Working" with the ADA's "regarded as" definition of a disability. 5 Tex. Forum Civ. Liberties & Civ. Rights 81 (2000).

Anupa Soni-Gohel, Note. Asymptomatic HIV finds no refuge in the Fourth Circuit's workplace. (Runnebaum v. NationsBank of Maryland, 123 F.3d 156, 4th Cir. 1997.). 8 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 243 (1998).

Andrew C. Testerman, Comment.  The Supreme Court applies "corrective" and  "mitigating" common sense to the ADA. (Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 199 S. Ct. 2139, 1999.)  77 Denv. U. L. Rev. 165 (1999).

Bonnie Poitras Tucker, The Supreme Court's definition of disability under the ADA: a return to the Dark Ages.  52 Ala. L. Rev. 321 (2000).

Hilary Von Rohr, Recent development.  Lactation litigation and the ADA solution: a response to Martinez v. NBC.  4 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 341 (2000).

Maureen R. Walsh, Note. What constitutes a "disability" under the Americans with Disabilities Act: should court consider mitigating measures? 55 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 917 (1998).

Melissa S. Wandersee The far-reaching effects of reproduction as a "major life activity" under the ADA: what will this expansion mean to employers and their insured? 3 J. Small & Emerging Bus. L. 429 (1999).

Bryan J. Warren,  Recent decision. When determining whether an ADA claimant is disabled, the claimant's impairment must be considered in light of available corrective measures, and failure to meet DOT regulations does not establish that the claimant was regarded as disabled. (Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 119 S. Ct. 2133, 1999.). 38 Duq. L. Rev. 1143 (2000).

Jessica Lynne Wilson, Technology as a panacea: why pregnancy-related problems should be defined without regard to mitigating measure under the ADA. 52 Vand. L. Rev. 831 (1999).

Joanne L. Wisner, Comment. Asymptomatic HIV disease as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act: a contrast between....(Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S. Ct. 2196, 1998; and Runnebaum v. NationsBank of Md., N.A., 123 F. 3d 156, 4th Cir. 1997.). 33 New Eng. L. Rev. 217 (1998).

Heidi R. Youngs, Reproduction as a major life activity under the ADA: a survey of the law beginning with the Eighth Circuit. 31 Creighton L. Rev. 455 (1998).

Education

Learning disabilities.  30 J.L. & Educ. 153 (2001).

Learning Disabilities  30 J.L. & Educ. 341 (2001).

Note. Agostini v. Felton: Sanctioning a trend in the accommodation of educational services for underprivileged and disabled children. 29 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1008 (1999).

Jane Easter Bahls, Challenging the bar exam on hidden disabilities. 27 Student Law. 20 (1999).

Jane Easter Bahls, Disability dilemma: Are law schools helping or hurting their learning-disabled students by accommodating "hidden disabilities"? 26 Student Law 18 (1998).

Jeri D. Barclay, Student article. Fiscal accountability under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: how do we ensure the money is spent on handicapped education and related services? 28 J. L. & Educ. 327 (1999).

Jonathan A. Beyer, A modest proposal: mediating IDEA disputes without splitting the baby. 28 J. L. & Educ. 37 (1999).

LaDonna L. Boeckman, Note. Bestowing the key to public education: the effects of judicial determination of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act on disabled and nondisabled students. 46 Drake L. Rev. 855 (1998).

Patricia L. Bors, Note. Academic freedom faces learning disabilities (Guckenberger v. Boston Univ., 957 F. Supp. 306, D. Mass. 1997.). 25 J.C. & U.L. 581 (1999).

Theresa J. Bryant, The death knell for school expulsion: the 1997 Amendments of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. 47 Am. U. L. Rev. 487 (1998).

Elizabeth A. Bunch, Student article. School discipline under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: how the stay-put provision limits schools in providing a safe learning environment. 27 J.L. & Educ. 315 (1998).

Charles A. DeGrandpre, Special education in correctional facilities in New Hampshire. 38 N. H. B. J. 78 (1997).

Jennifer D. Dougherty, Note. Sanctioning a trend in the accommodation of educational services for underprivileged and disabled children. (Agostini v. Felton, 117 S. Ct.1997.). 29 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1008 (1999).

William L. Dowling, Comment. Special education and the private school student: the mistake of the IDEA Amendments Act. 81 Marq. L. Rev. 79 (1997).

Anne P. Dupre, Disability and the public schools: the case against "inclusion." 72 Wash. L. Rev. 775 (1997).

Anne P. Dupre, Disability, deference, and the integrity of the academic enterprise. 32 Ga. L. Rev. 393 (1998).

Alessio David Evangelista, Full inclusion and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: a clear and convincing standard for cases involving the least restrictive environment provision. 6 The Digest 45 (1998).

Tara L Eyer, Greater expectations: how the 1997 IDEA amendments raise the basic floor of opportunity for children with disabilities. 103 Dick. L. Rev. 613 (1999).

William S. Fields & Carol A. Marchant, The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Department of Defense Educational Programs: DDES CASE No. 97-001 (March 24, 1998). 158 Mil. L. Rev. 147 (1998).

James R. Flynn, The hidden history of IQ and special education: can the problems be solved?  6 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 191 (2000).

Alan Gartner, What to do with difference: the ADA, special education, and disability.  62 Ohio St. L.J. 555 (2001).

Cynthia Godsoe, Caught betwen two systems: how exceptional children in out-of-home care are denied equality in education.  19 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 81 (2000).

Steven S. Goldberg, Special education mediations: responding to a proposal for reform.  30 J.L. & Educ. 127 (2001).

Renae Waterman Groeschel, Comment. Discipline and the disabled student: the IDEA reauthorization responds. 1998 Wis. L. Rev. 1085 (1998).

Robert Caperton Hannon, Returning to the true goal of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: self-sufficiency. 50 Vand. L. Rev. 715 (1997).

Jay P. Heubert, Schools without rules? Charter schools, Federal Disability Law, and the paradoxes of deregulation. 32 Harv. C.R - C.L. L. Rev. 301 (1997).

Joanne L. Huston, Inclusion: a proposed remedial approach ignores legal and education issues. 27 J.L. & Educ. 3249 (1998).

H. Scott Jacobsen, Note. Case retrospective: Shannon M. continues to leave her controversial mark on a Utah school district's medically demanding special education students. (Granite Sch. Dist. v. Shannon M., 787 F. Supp. 1020, D. Utah 1992.). J. L. & Fam. Stud. 1 83 (1999).

Jennifer Johnson, IDEA and Honig v Doe: the suspension of educationally disabled students. 38 N.H. B. J. 52 (1997).

Kats, Lucy, Comment. The United States Supreme Court's limitations of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act forces a court to prevent a disabled student from receiving a meaningful public education by denying him the necessary services of participation in athletics. 11 Seton Hall J. Sport L. 351 (2001).

James P. Kelly, Student article. Consistency & cooperation: the lessons of Guckenberger v. Boston University. 28 J. L. & Educ. 319 (1999).

Laura Ketterman, Comment.  Does the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act exclude gifted and talented children with emotional disabilities?  An analysis of..(J.D. v. Pawlet, 224 F.3d 60, 2d Cir. 2000.)  32 St Mary's L.J. 913 (2001).

Lisa R. Knickerbocker, Note.  The education of al children with disabilities: integrating home-schooled children into the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.  62 Ohio St. L.J. 1515 (2001).

Christine Moyles Kovan, Casebrief. Disability law--pendent placement and financial responsibility under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: the Third Circuit's extension of Burlington. (Sesquenita School District v. Rawlee S., 96 F.3d 78, 3d Cir. 1996.). 42 Vill. L. Rev. 1867 (1997).

Tracey I. Levy, Legal obligations and workplace implications for institutions of higher education accommodating learning disabled students.  30 J.L. & Educ. 85 (2001).

Leon N. Mayer, Casenote. The interaction of the Headlee Amendment to the Michigan Constitution and funding for special education provided by the state to local school districts. (Durant v. State of Michigan, 456 Mich. 175, 566 N.W.2d 272, 1977.). 1988 Det. C.L. Mich. St. U. L. Rev. 893 (1998).

Thomas A. Mayes and Perry A. Zirkel, State educational agencies and special education: obligations and liabilities.  10 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 62 (2000).

Austin  L. McMullen, Disabled former employees under the ADA:  unprincipled decisions and unpalatable results.  52 Vand. L. Rev. 769 (1999).

Christopher M. Morrison, High-stake tests and students with disabilities.  41 B.C. L. Rev. 1139 (2000).

Kyle Murray and Lelia B. Helms, The buck stops here: graduate level disability services and the 1998 Rehabilitation Act Amendments.  28 J.C. & U.L.   1 (2001).

Trent D. Nelson, Comment. Congressional attention needed for the "stay-put" provision of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. 1997 BYU Educ. & L.J. 49 (1997).

Paul T. O'Neill, Special education and hight stakes testing:  an analysis of current law and policy.  30 J.L.& Educ. 185 (2001).

Ranko Shiraki Oliver, Overview of federal laws protecting students with disabilities in colleges and universities.  34 Ark. Law. 20 (1999).

Ranko Shiraki Oliver, Overview of federal laws protecting students with disabilities in colleges and universities. 34 Ark. Law. 20 (1999).

Allan G. Osborne, Jr., County of San Diego v. California Special Education Hearing Office: a rational decision consistent with prior case law. 27 J. L. & Educ. 261 (1998).

Tobin P. Richer, County of San Diego v. California Special Education Hearing Office: a misapplication and drastic expansion of IDEA coverage. 26 J. L. & Educ. 1 (1997).

Laura F. Rothstein, Higher education and disabilities: trends and developments. 27 Stetson L. Rev. 119 (1997).

Matthew J. Schaefer, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: "Related Services" versus "Medical Services?" [Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F., 119 S. Ct. 992, 1999.). 39 Washburn L. J. 143 (1999).

Rex R. Schultze, Reading, writing and ritalin: the responsibility of public school districts to administer medications to students. 32 Creighton L. Rev. 793 (1999).

Scott Shanker, Providing medically related services to children with disabilities in public schools. (Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret, 119 S. Ct. 992, 1999.)  45 St. Louis U. L.J. 231-260 (2001).

Stephen C. Shannon, The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: determing "appropriate relief" in a post-Gwinnett era. 85 Va. L. Rev. 853 (1999).

J. Patrick Shannon, Who is an "otherwise qualified" law student? A need for law schools to develop technical standards. 10 U. Fla. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 57 (1998).

Ellen Jean Shemitz, Protecting children at risk in New Hampshire: the partnership between the juvenile justice and special education systems. 38 N.H. B. J. 60 (1997).

William J. Smith, The placement of students with disabilities and the "best interest" standard. 8 Educ. & L.J. 251 (1997).

Kevin H. Smith, Disabilities, law schools, and law students: a proactive and holistic approach. 32 Akron L. Rev. 1 (1999).

Michael T. Snyder, Comment. An examination of the New York State Board of Law Examiners' policy towards individuals with learning disabilities. 62 Alb. L. Rev. 737 (1998).

Kevin D. Stanley, Note. A model for interpretation of mainstreaming compliance under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: Board of Education v. Holland. 65 UMKC L. Rev. 303 (1996).

Sharon C. Streett, The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. 19 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 19 (1996).

Nicolas P. Terry, Bricks plus bytes:  How "click-and-brick" will define legal education space.  46 Vill. L. Rev. 95 (2001).

Kelly S. Thompson, Note. Limits on the ability to discipline disabled school children: do the 1997 amendments to the IDEA go far enough? 32 Ind. L. Rev. 565 (1999).

Lauri M. Traub, Comment. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: a free appropriate public education--at what cost? 22 Hamline L. Rev. 663 (1999).

Bonnie Poitras Tucker, Disability discrimination in higher education: 1996 case law in review. 24 J.C. & J.L. 243 (1997).

Bonnie Poitras Tucker, Disability discrimination in higher education. 25 J.C. & M.L. 349 (1998).

Stephen Verotsky, Case note.  Civie rights--Individuals with Disabilities Education Act--right to a free appropriate public education and the limits of the medical services exclusion. (Cedar Rapids Community Sch. Dist. v. Garret F., 119 S. Ct. 992, 1999.)  67 Tenn L. Rev 493 (2000).

Mark C. Weber, Disability discrimination in higher education.  27 J.C. & U.L. 417 (2000).

Mark C. Weber, Disability discrimination litigation and institutions of higher education. 25 J.C. & U.L. 53-67 (1998).

Tamara J. Weinstein, Note.  Equal educational opportunities for learning deficient students.  68 Geo.Wash. L. Rev. 500 (2000).

Andrew Weis, Jumping to conclusions in "Jumping the Queue". (Reviewing Mark Kelman and Gillian Lester, Jumping the Queue: an inquiry into the legal treatment of students with learning disabilities.). 51 Stan. L. Rev. 183 (1998).

Theresa M. Williard, Note. Economics and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: the influence of funding formulas on the identification and placement of disabled students. 31 Ind. L. Rev. 1167 (1998).

Perry A. Zirkel, Introduction: accommodating legal education for "DWE" students: lawful or awful? 27 J.L. & Educ. 615 (1998).

Perry A. Zirkel, Introduction: does Beyer provide a cure for the IDEA mediation baby?  30 J.L. & Educ. 123 (2001).
 

Employment

Robert J. Aalberts & Lorne H. Seidman, Employee notice requirements under the Family and Medical Leave Act: are they manageable? 24 Pepp. L. Rev. 1209 (1997).

Cabrelle Abel, Note. To allow to sue, or not to allow to sue: Zimmerman v. Oregon Department of Justice decides Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act does not apply to employment discrimination. (Zimmerman v. Oregon Dept. of Justice, 170 F.3d 1169, 9th Cir. 1999.)   24 Seattle U.L. Rev. 969 (2001).

Marjorie Baldwin, The effects of impairments on employment and wages: estimates from the 1984 and 1990 SIPP. Behav. Sci. & L. 7 (1999).

Allyson R. Behm, Note.  The Americans with (or without) Disabilities Act: pre-employmnet medical inquiries and the non-disabled.  26 Am. J.L. & Med. 439 (2000).

Amy S. Berry, Comment. The reality of work-related stress: an analysis of how mental disability claims should be handled under the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act. 20 Campbell L. Rev. 321 (1998).

John Bisordi, Student article.  "I can't work, just kidding, I can." The effects that applying for disability benefits have on an ADA claim.  45 Vill. L. Rev. 627 (2000).

Douglas A. Blair, Employees suffering from bipolar disorder or clinical depression: fighting an uphill battle for protection under Title 1 of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 29 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1347 (1999).

Peter David Blanck, Introduction to "Special section: employment and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Behav. Sci. & L. 3 (1999).

Peter David Blanck & Mollie Weighner Marti, Attitudes, behavior and the employment provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 42 Vill. L. Rev. 3345 (1997).

John W. Boyle, Comment. The error Eckles: why seniority rights present an undue hardship for employees with disabilities. (Eckles v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 94 F. 3d 1041, 7th Cir. 1996.). 35 Duq. L. Rev. 1023 (1997).

Bryant S.Carroll, III, Comment. The Americans with Disabilities Act and shipboard jobs: a primer. 22 Tul. Mar. L.J. 231 (1997).

Karen Dill Danforth, Reading reasonableness out of the ADA: responding to threats by employees with mental illness following Palmer. 85 Va. L. Rev. 661 (1999).

Gregory M. P. Davis, More than a supervisor bargains for: individual liability under the Americans with Disabilities Act and other employment statutes. 2 Wisc. L. Rev. 321 (1997).

Tim Edwards, Constitutional limits on an employer's right to dictate the terms of an addict's recovery under the ADA: some sobering concerns. 44 Wayne L. Rev. 1679 (1999).

Mellissa A. Essary & Terence D. Friedman, Retaliation claims under Title VII, the ADEA and ADA: untouchable employees, uncertain employers, unresolved courts. 63 Mo. L. Rev. 115 (1998).

Bruce M. Familant, Comment. The essential functions of being a lawyer with a non-visible disability: on the wings of a kiwi bird. 15 T.M. Cooley L. Rev. 517 (1998).

Susan M. Gibson, Note. The Americans with Disabilities Act protects individuals with a history of cancer from employment discrimination: myth or reality: 16 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 167 (1998).

Lisa K. Gigliotti, Drugs, alcohol, and the Americans with Disabilities Act: balancing the interests of the bar with the interest of member recovery. Mich. B. J. 288 (1997).

Maggie D. Gold, Comment. Must insurers treat all illnesses equally?--Mental vs. physical illness: congressional and administrative failure to end limitations to and exclusions from coverage for mental illness in employer-provided health benefits under the Mental Health Parity Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. 4 Conn. Ins. L.J. 767 (1998).

Randal I. Goldstein, Note.  Mental illness in the workplace after Sutton v. United Air Lines.  86 Cornell L. Rev. 927 (2001).

Deborah Gridley, Note. Genetic testing under the ADA:  a case for protection from employment discrimination.  89 Geo. L.J. 973 (2001).

Thomas R. Head, III, Comment. Workers' Compensation for job-related mental disease claims--stress reliever or judicial headache? (Crochiere v. Board of Education of Enfield, 227 Conn. 333, 630 A. 2d 1027, 1993.). 21 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 131 (1997).

Constance Kleiner Hood, Age discrimination in employment and the Americans with Disabilities Act: "A second bite at the apple." 6 Elder L. J. 1 (1998).

Samuel Issacharoff and Justin Nelson, Discrimination with a difference: can employment discrimination law accommodate the Americans with Disabilities Act?  79 N.C. L. Rev. 307 (2001).

Vicki J. Limas, Significant employment law decisions in the 1997-98 term: a clarification of sexual harassment law and a broad definition of disability. 34 Tulsa L.J. 307 (1999).

Linda J. Lorenat, Comment. "Disabling" workers' compensation exclusivity: enabling California workers to file work-related disability discrimination claims in state court. 38 Santa Clara L. Rev. 893 (1998).

Charles B. Lynch, The Americans with Disabilities Act and disability benefit plans. 22 Seton Hall Legis. J. 561 (1998).

Donna L. Mack, Comment. Former employees' right to relief under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Wash. L. Rev. 74 425 (1999).

Nichole Martinson, Inequality between disabilities: the different treatment of mental versus physical disabilities in long-term disability benefit plans. 50 Baylor L. Rev. 361 (1998).

Austin L. McMullen, Disabled former employees under the ADA: unprincipled decisions and unpalatable results. 52 Vand. L. Rev. 769 (1999).

Karin Mika & Denise Wimbiscus, Responsibilites of employers toward mentally disabled persons under the Americans with Disabilities Act. 11 J. L. & Health 173 (1996).

Stephanie Proctor Miller, Keeping the promise: the ADA and employment discirmination on the basis of psychiatric disability. 85 Cal. L. Rev. 701 (1997).

Jonathan R. Mook, Using the ADA to challenge employee benefit plan limitations. 11 Benefits L.J. 25 (1998).

Ellen Moscowitz, Outside the "compensation bargain:" protecting the rights of workers disabled on the job to file suits for disability discrimination. 37 Santa Clara L. Rev. 587 (1997).

Jason Powers, Note. Employment discrimination claims under ADA Title II: the case for uniform administrative exhaustion requirements. 76 Tex. L. Rev. 1457 (1998).

Christine Neagle, Comment.  An analysis of the applicability of hostile work environment liability to the ADA.  3 U.Pa. J. Lab. & Emp. L. 715 (2001).

Louis S. Rulli, Employmnet discrimination litigation under the ADA from the perspective of the poor: can the promise of Title I be fulfilled for low-income workers in the next decade?  9 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 354 (2000).

James P. Sadler, Comment. The alcoholic and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: the "booze made me do it" argument finds little recognition in employment discrimination actions. 28 Tex. Tech. L. Rev. 61 (1997).

Teresa L. Scheid, Employment of individuals with mental disabilities: business response to the ADA's challenge. Behav. Sci. & L. 73 (1999).

William L. Schott, The unionization of people with disabilities and its impact on the rehabilitation process. 9 J.F.K. U. L. Rev. 23 (1998).

Pamela Signorello, Note.  The failure of the ADA--achieving parity with respect to mental and physical health care coverage in the private employment realm.  10 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 349 (2001).

Katherine A. Staton & Thomas A. Caswell, The Americans with Disabilities Act as it relates to employment in the aviation industry: navigating through uncontrolled airspace. 64 J. Air L. & Com. 459 (1999).

Susan Stefan, "You'd have to be crazy to work here:" worker stress, the abusive workplace, and Title I of the ADA. 31 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 795 (1998).

Jan W. Sterrner, Comment. Preemployment medical exams under the ADA: conditional job offers and the application of the mixed-motives framework. 50 Ark. L. Rev. 449 (1997).

Natalie Palmer Jones Storch, Comment. The standard of employer liability under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. 66 U. Cin. L. Rev. 931 (1998).

Jan William Sturner, Arbitration, labor contracts, and the ADA: the benefits of pre-dispute arbitration agreements and an update on the conflict between the duty to accommodate and seniority rights. 21 U. Ark. L.R. L. Rev. 455 (1999).

John M. Vande Walle, Note. In the eye of the beholder: issues of distributive and corrective justice in the ADA's employment protection for persons regarded as disabled. 73 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 897 (1998).

Marta B. Varela, Protection of deomestic violence victims under the New York City Human Rights Law's provisions prohibiting discrimination on the basis of disability.  27 Fordham Urb.L.J. 1261 (2000).

Gregory R. Vetter Comment. Is a personality test a pre-job-offer medical examination under the ADA? 93 NW U. L. Rev. 597 (1999).

Mark C. Weber, Beyond the Americans with Disabilities Act: a national employment policy for a people with disabilities. 46 Buff. L. Rev. 123 (1998).

Mark C. Weber, The Americans with Disabilities Act and employment: a non-retrospective.  52 Ala. L. Rev. 375 (2000).
 
 

General
 

Symposium:  The Americans with Disabilities Act--Past present and future:  developing law over a decade.  9 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 233 (2000).

AppendixA -- The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990  9 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 425 (2000).

Appendix B -- Regulations to implement the Equal Employment Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act.  9 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 479 (2000).

Appendix C -- Appendix to Part 1630-- Interpretive duidance on Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act.  9 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 493 (2000).

Symposium:  Facing the Challenges of the ADA: the first ten years and beyond.  62 Ohio St. L.J. 1 (2001).

Symposium: The Americans with Disabilities Act:  A ten-year retrospective. Articles by Peter David Blanck, Michael Millender, Mary Crossley, James Leonard, Michael L. Perlin, Laura F. Rothstein, Susan Stefan, Bonnie Poitras Tucker, Mark C. Weber and Rodrigo Jimenez.  52 Ala. L. Rev. 1 (2000).

Disabilities and Disability Law. Articles by Susan Johanne Adams and Laura F. Rothstein. 48 J. Legal Educ. 273 (1998).

Recent developments in the law. Handicapped. 26 J. L. & Educ. 105 (1997).

Special issue on the Americans with Disabilities Act. 38 S. Tex. L. Rev. 861 (1997).

Steven H. Aden, HIV/AIDS and the public accommodations provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act.  9 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. . Rev. 395 (2000).

Mariam Alikhan, Note.  The ADA is narrowing mental health inquiries on bar applications: looking to the medical profession to decide where to go from here.  14 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 159 (2000).

John Christopher Anderson, Three generations later and still no class: protecting Americans with disabilities under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3), the Ku Klux Klan Act. 47 Drake L. Rev. 537 (1999).

Adrienne Asch, Critical race theory, feminism and disability: reflections on social justice and personal identity.  62 Ohio St. L.J. 391 (2001).

Jan Baker, Promoting client self advocacy. 34 Ark. Law. 6 (1999).

Harry Beatty, Ontario disability support program: policy and implementation. 14 J. L. & Soc. Pol'y 1 (1999).

Peter Blanck, Civil war pensions and disability  62 Ohio St. L.J. 109 (2001).

Peter David Black and Michael Millender, Before disability civil rights:  Civil War pensions and the politics of disability in America.  52 Ala. L. Rev. 1 (2000).

Robert L. Burgdorf, Jr., Equal members of the community: the public accommodations provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 64 Temp. L. Rev. 551 (1991).

Robert L. Burgdorf, Jr., The Americans with Disabilities Act: analysis and implications of a second-generation civil rights statue. 26 Harv. C. R. - C.L. L. Rev. 413 (1991).

Scott Burris, Kathryn Moss, Michael Ullman and Matthew C. Johnsen, Disputing under the Americans with Disabilities Act:  empirical answers and some questions.  9 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 237 (2000).

Keith Alan Byers, No one is above the law when it comes to the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act-not even federal, state, or local law enforcement agencies. 30 Loyola L.A. L. Rev. 977 (1997).

Ruth Colker, Hyper- capitalism: affirmative protection for people with disabilities, illness, and parenting responsibilities under United States law. 9 Yale J. L. Feminism 213 (1997).

Larry E. Craig, The Americans with Disabilities Act: prologue, promise, product and performance. 35 Idaho L. Rev. 205 (1999).

Matthew J. Crehan, The disability-based peremptory challenge: does it validate discrimination against blind prospective jurors? 25 N. Ky. L. Rev. 531 (1998).

Mary Crossley, The disability kaleidoscope. 74 Notre Dame L. Rev. 621 (1999).

Matthew W. Daus, Negligence and the ADA. N.Y. St. B.J. 30 (1998).

Gabriella A. Davi, The progression toward freedom: protecting the disabled under the Ku Klux Klan Act. 20 Col. L. Rev. 1019 (1999).

Jennifer Lee Dozier, Semper fidelis: voices of the disabled veteran. 5 Geo. J. Fighting Poverty 57 (1997).

Curtis D. Edmonds, Four emerging issues in Americans with Disabilities Act ligigation involving hospitals and other health care providers.  20 Rev. Litig. 623 (2001).

David M. Engel and Frank W. Munger, Re-interpreting the effect of rights:  career narratives and the ADA.  62 Ohio St. L.J. 285 (2001).

David M. Engel and Frank W. Munger, Re-interpreting the effect of rights: career narratives and the ADA.  62 Ohio St. L.J. 285 (2001).

Chai R. Feldblum, The (R)evolution of physical disability anti-discrimination law: 1976-1996. 20 MPDLR 621 (1996).

Nicole Fiocco, Comment. The unpopular disabled: drug addicts and alcoholics lose benefits. 49 Admin. L. Rev. 1007 (1997).

Jennifer Fitzgerald, Geneticizing disability: the human genome project and the commodification of self. 14 Issues L. Med. 147 (1998).

Ian Freckelton, Therapeutic appellate decision-making in the contex of disabled litigants.  24 Seattle U.L. Rev. 313 (2000).

John P. Gause, The ADA in practice: navigating the minefield. 13 Me. L.J. 30 (1998).

Robert Hammel, Some reflections on New York City's disability law. 23 Fordham Urban L.J. 1195 (1996).

Ashley S. Heron, Comment. The American with Disabilities Act: who can claim its protection? 48 Ala. L. Rev. 1023 (1997).

Christy Hetherington, Note.  Rhode Island facing the wrongful birth/life debate: pro-disabled sentiment given life. (Emerson v. Magendantz, 689 A.2dd 409, R.I. 1997.)  6 Roger Wms. U. L. Rev. 565 (2001).

Stacy A. Hickox, Absenteeism under the Family and Medical Leave Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act.  50 DePaul L. Rev. 183-219 (2000).

Sharona Hoffman, First, do no harm: why doctors are not omnipotent under the Americans with Disabilities Act. 14 Hofstra Lab. L.J. 151 (1996).

Bretton J. Horttor, A survey of living will and advanced health care directives. 74 N.D. L. Rev. 233 (1998).

Stephen W. Jones, The Supreme Court reins in the Americans with Disabilities Act. 22 U. of Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 183 (2000).

Stephen T. Kaminski, Must employers pay for Viagra? An Americans with Disabilities Act analysis post-Bragdon and Sutton  4 DePaul J. Health Care L. 73 (2000).

Lawrence W. Kaye and Jeffrey B. Malzman, 'Twas the night before regulations: foreign-flag cruise ships and the ADA.  75 Tul. L. Rev. 1571 (2001).

Kelly E. Konkright, An analysis of the applicability of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act with internet access providers.  37 Idaho L. Rev. 713 (2001).

Cary LaCheen, Using Title II of theAmericans with Disabilities Act on behalf of clients in TANF programs.  8 Geo. J. on Poverty & Pol'y 1 (2001).

Michael Lewyn, "Thous shalt not put a stumbling block before the blind": the Americans with Disabilities Act and public transit for the disabled.  52 Hastings L.J. 1037 (2001).

John A. Liekweg, The Americans with Disabilities Act, Section 504, and church-related institutions. 38 Cath. Law 87 (1998).

Paul K. Longmore, The Americans with Disabilities Act has failed to live up to its promise. 48 Cal. Law. (1998).

Ronald K. Lospennato, New Hampshire and federal law of entitlements for Americans with disabilities: where do we go from here? 38 N.H. B. J. 40 (1997).

Tony R. Maida, Note. How judicial myopia is jeopardizing the protection of people with HIV/AIDS under the ADA.  27 Am. J.L. & Med. 301 (2001).

Ken Matheny, Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp. and the need for a consistent disability policy.  21 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol'y 283 (2000).

Arlene B. Mayerson and Silvia Yee, THe ADA and models of equality.  62 Ohio St. L.J. 535 (2001).

Monica E. McFadden, ADA-is the glass half empty or...? Trial 28 (1997).

Miranda McGowan, Reconsidering the Americans with Disabilites Act.  35 Ga. L. Rev. 27 (2000).

Armen H. Merjian, AIDS, welfare, and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 16 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 373 (1998).

Adam A. Milani, Go ahead.  Make my 90 days:  should plaintiff be required to provide notice to defendants before filing suite under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act?  2001 Wis. L. Rev. 107 (2001).

Adam A. Milani, Living in the world: a new look at the disabled in the law of torts. 48 Cath. U. L. Rev. 323 (1999).

Geoffrey P. Miller and Lori S. Singer, Handicapped parking.  29 Hofstra L. Rev. 81 (2000).

Paul Steven Miller, A just alternative or just an alternative?  Mediation and the ADA.  62 Ohio St. L.J. 11 (2001).

Scott A. Moss & Daniel A. Malin, Note. Public funding for disability accommodations: a rational solution to rational discrimination and the disabilities of the ADA. 33 Harv. C.R. - C.L. L. Rev. 197 (1998).

Kathryn Moss, Michael Ullman, Matthew C. Johnsten, Barbara E. Starrett & Scott Burris, Differnet paths to justice: the ADA, employment, and administrative enforcement by the EEOC and FEPAs. Behav. Sc. & L. 29 (1999).

Pamela Mucklow, Personal liability under the Americans with Disabilities Act. 26 Colo. Law. 47 (1997).

John W. Parry, Mental and physical disability rights: the formative years and future prospects. 20 MPDLR 627 (1996).

Donna Pettus, Disability, DRC and the law. 34 Ark. Law. 5 (1999).

Jennifer Pokempner and Dorothy E. Roberts, Poverty, welfare reform, and the meaning of disability  62 Ohio St. L.J. 425 (2001).

Kathleen T. Price, Welfare reform and its effect on children with disabilities. Nevada Law. 14 (1998).

Brian C. Ralston, Comment. Does the Americans with Disabilities Act discriminate based on education when plaintiffs suffer from carpal tunnel syndrom: an examination of Ouzts & Pepke v. USAir and EEOC v. Joslyn Manufacturing Co. 102 Dick. L. Rev. 891 (1998).

Hon. Marjorie O. Rendell, Foreword  9 Temp. Pol. & Div. Rts. L. Rev. 233 (2000).

R. Jason Richards, Disabilities in notary law and practice. 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1033 (1999).

Laura F. Rothstein, The affirmative action debate in legal education and the legal profession: lessons from disability discrimination law. 2 J. Gender Race & Just. 1 (1998).

Laura F. Rothstein, Celebrating the tenth anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act.  37 Hous. L. Rev. 979-986 (2000).

Laura F. Rothstein, Health care professionals with mental and physical impairments: developments in disability discrimination law. 41 St. Louis U. L.J. 973 (1997).

Laura F. Rothstein, Reflections on disability discrimination. 22 U. Ark. at Little Rock L. Rev. 147 (2000).

Laura F. Rothstein, Disability discrimination. 23 J.C. & Univ. L. 475 (1997).

Laura F. Rothstein, Teaching disability law. 48 J. Legal Educ. 297 (1998).

Leslie J. Scallet, Disability policy and legislation: A retrospective and prospective overview. 20 MPDLR 622 (1996).

Kay Schriner and Lisa A. Ochs, Creating the disabled citizen:  hwo Massachusetts disenfranchised people under guardianship.  62 Ohio St. L.J. 481 (2001).

Dave Shade, Empowerment for the pursuit of happiness: parents with disabilities and the Americans with Disabilities Act. 16 L. Inequality 153 (1998).

Yama Shansab, Note. And what of the meek?: Devising a constitutionally recognized duty to protect the disabled at state residential schools. 6 Wm. & Mary Bill of Rts. J. 777 (1998).

Anita Silvers, Reprising women's disability: feminist identity strategy and disability rights. 13 Berkeley Women's L. J. 81 (1998).

Peter M. Spingola, Comment. The Seventh Circuit slam dunks the rights of the disabled. (Knapp v. Northwestern University, 117 S. Ct. 2454, 1997.). 73 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 709 (1998).

Deborah Spitalnik, An overview of policy issues in access to care for children with disabilities. 19 Pace L. Rev. 285 (1999).

Stephanie Jae Stevenson, Tenth Circuit survey. 707 disability law. 73 Denv. U. L. Rev. 707 (1996).

Danielle Strickman, From the consumer's viewpoint: have attorneys aided in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act? 34 Ark. Law. 14 (1999).

Luther Sutter, The Americans with Disabilites Act of 1990: a road now too narrow. 22 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 161 (2000).

William M. Tarnow, Genetic and mental disorders under the ADA. 2 DePaul J. Health Care L. 291 (1998).

Kathleen A. Tarr, Above and beyond: veterans disabled by military service. 5 Geo. J. Fighting Poverty 39 (1997).

Dick Thornburgh, Reflections on the Americans with Disabilities Act.  37 Hous. L. Rev. 987-998 (2000).

Carolyn J. Trevis & Jean F. Holloway, Working with disability: disability benefits and the ADA. 55 Bench & B. Minn. 31 (1998).

Bonnie Poitras Tucker, The ADA's revolving door: inherent flaws in the civil rights paradigm.  62 Ohio St. L.J. 335 (2001).

Kenneth J. Vanko, In search of common ground: leveling the playing field for chemically dependent workers under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. 4 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1257 (1996).

Marta B. Varela,  Developments in disability law.  27 Fordham Urb L.J. 1150 (2000).

Marta B. Varela, Protection of domestic violence victims under the New York City Human Rights Law's provisions prohibiting discrimination on the basis of disability.  17 Fordham Urb. L.J. (2000).

Timothy Verhoff, Class struggles: a century after the Ku Klux Klan Act and still seeking protection for the disabled. 1999 Wisc. L. Rev. 153 (1999).

James R. Wade, Recent developments in representing disabled clients. Tr. & Est. 35 (1997).

Rebecca Walker, Note. Governing physician-associated risk disclosure by adopting the ADA, "direct threat" approach: doctors, pack up your stethoscopes and get out your checkbooks. 1997 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1199 (1997).

Aaron J. Walker, Note. "No distinction would be tolerated": Thaddeus Stevens, disability,and the original intent of the Equal Protection Clause.  19 YaleL. & Pol'y Rev. 265 (2000).

Mark C. Weber, Disability and the law of welfare: a post-integrationist examination.  2000 U. Ill. L. Rev. 889 (2000).

Andrew Weis, Preemptory challengers: the last barrier to jury service for people with disabilities. 33 Willamette L. Rev. 1 (1997).

Maureen C. Weston, The road best traveled: removing judicial roadblocks that prevent workers from obtaining both disability benefits and ADA civil rights protection. 26 Hofstra L. Rev. 377 (1997).

William D. Wickard, Comment.  THe new Americans without a disability act:  the surprisingly successful plight of the non-disabled plaintiff under the ADA.  61 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 1023 (2000).

Nathaniel R. Wolf, Americans with Disabilities Act.  2000 Law Rev. Mich. S. U.-Det. C.L. 543 (2000).

R. George Wright, Persons with disabilities and the meaning of constitutional equal protection. 60 Ohio S. L. J. 145 (1999).

Jason Zarin, Beyond the bright line: Consideration of externalities, the meaning of undue hardship, and the allocation of the burden of proof under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 7 S. Cal. Interdisc. L. J. 511 (1998).

Healthcare

Symposium: "Conducting Medical Research on the Decisionally Impaired". 1 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 1 (1998).

Alexander Abbe, Comment. "Meaningful access" to health care and the remedies available to Medicaid managed care recipients under the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act. U. Pa. L. Rev. 147 1161 (1999).

Mary R. Anderlik and Wendy J. Wilkinson, The Americans with Disabilities Act and managed care.  37 Hous. L. Rev. 163 (2000).

Chad Baruch, ADA practitioners beware: a brief comment on Soignier v. American Board of Plastic Surgery. 3 Tex. F. C.L. & C. R. 91 (1997).

Alan Bloom & William H. Ginsburg, Managed care rankings: are they rank? 19 Whittier L. Rev. 69 (1997).

Mary Anne Bobinski, Patients and providers in the courts: fractures in the Americans with Disabilities Act. 61 Alb. L. Rev. 785 (1998).

James F.Childress, The National Bioethics Advisory Commission: bridging the gaps in human subjects research protection. 1 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 105 (1998).

Roger Clegg, Bragdon v. Abbott, asympotomatic genetic conditions, and antidiscrimination law: a conservative perspective.  3 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 409 (2000).

Mary Crossley, Becoming visible: the ADA's impact on health care for persons with disabilities.  52 Ala. L. Rev. 51 (2000).

Evan G. DeRenzo, Robert R. Conley, & Raymond Love, Assessment of capacity to give consent to research participation:  state-of-the-art and beyond.  1 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 66 (1998).

Linca C. Fentiman, Health care access for children with disabilities. 19 Pace L. Rev. 245 (1999).

Shoshanna Fishman, Note. Unnecessary institutionalization constitutes discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Law. (Olmstead v. Zimring, 119 S. Ct. 2176, 1999.)  3 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 430 (2000).

Laurie M Flynn & Ronald S. Honberg, Achieving proper balance in research with decisionally-incapacitated subjects: NAMI's perspectives on the working group's proposal. 1 J. Health Car. L. & Pol'y 174 (1998).

Richard E. Gardner, III, Comment> Mind over matter?: the historical suearch for meaningful parity between mental and physical health care coverage.  49 Emory L.J. 675 (2000).

Joseph N. Harden, Comment. The "gift" of life: should anencephalic infants die to serve noble goals? 27 Cumb. L. Rev. 1279 (1997).

Diane E. Hoffman & Jack Schwartz, Proxy consent to participation of the decisionally impaired in medical research--Maryland's policy initiative. 1 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 123 (1998).

Eugenia Liu, Bragdon v. Abbott: extending the Americans with Disabilities Act to asymptomatic individuals.  3 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 382 (2000).

Adam A. Milani, Re-defing Disability.  Legal protection for individual with HIV, genetic predispositions to disease, or asymptomatic diseases. Articles by Paul Steven Miller, David W. Webber, Lawrence O. Gostin, Laura F. Rothstein, Deborah Kaplan, Katherine A. Schneider. 3 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 225 (2000).

Adam A. Milani, "Oh, say, can I see--and who do I sue if I can't?" wheelchair users, sightlines over standing spectators, and architect liability under the Americans with Disabilities Act.  52 Fla. L. Rev. 523 (2000).

Paul Steven Miller Is there a pink slip in my genes? Genetic discrimination in the workplace.  3 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 225 (2000).

Jonathan D. Moreno, Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired; history and gaps in the current regulatory system. 1 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 1 (1998).

Paul A. Nidich, Ethics, the National Bioethics Advisory Commission's report on research involving the mentally disordered, and therapeutic jurisprudence.  3 DePaul J. Health Care L. 527 (2000).

John M. Oldham, Stephan Haimowitz & Susan J. Delano, Regulating research with vulnerable populations: litigation gone awry. 1 J. Health Care L. & Pol's 154 (1998).

Phillip G. Peters, Jr., When physicians balk at futile care: implications of the disability rights laws. NW U. L. Rev 798.

Peter V. Rabins, Issues raised by research using persons suffering from dementia who have impaired decisional capacity. 1 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 22 (1998).

Laura F. Rothstein, Health care and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Various authors  37 Hous. L. Rev. 979 (2000).

Laura F. Rothstein, Genetic discrimination: why Bragdon does not ensure protection.  3 J. HealthCare L. & Pol'y 330 (2000).

Katherine A. Schneider, Adverse impact of predisposition testing on major life activities: lessons from BRCA1/2 testing.  3 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 365 (2000).

Jill L. Schultz, Note. The impact of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act on employer-provided insurance plans: is the insurance company subject to liability? Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 56 232 (1999).

Lois Shepherd,  HIV, the ADA, and the duty to treat.  37 Hous. L. Rev. 1055-1100 (2000).

Nathalie Smith, The right to genetic privacy? Are we unlocking the secrets of the human genome only to risk insurance and employment discrimination?  2000 Utah L. Rev. 705 (2000).

Clarence J. Sundram, In harm's way: research subjects who are decisionally impaired. 1 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 36 (1998).

Bonnie Poitras Tucker, Access to health care for individuals with hearing impairments.  37 Hous. L. Rev. 1101-1162 .

Jeffrey A. Van Detta, "Typhoid Mary" meets the ADA: a case study of the "direct threat" standard under the Americans with Disabilities Act. 22 Harv. J. L & Pub. Pol'y 849 (1999).

David W. Webber & Lawrence O. Gostin, Discrimination based on HIV/AIDS and other health conditions: "disability" as defined under federa and state law.  3 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 330 (2000).

Alison Wichman, Protecting vulnerable research subjects: practical realities of institutional review board review and approval. 1 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 88 (1998).

Housing

"Don't tread on the ADA": Olmstead v. L.C. ex rel. Zimring and the future of community integration for individuals with mental disabilities. 40 Boston C. L. Rev. 1221 (1999).

Robert J. Aalberts, Suits to void discriminatory evictions of disabled tenants under the Fair Housing Amendments Act: an emerging conflict? 33 Real Prop. Probate and Trust J. 649 (1999).

Stephen F. Befort and Tracey Holmes Donesky, Reawsignment under the Americans with Disabilitis Act: reasonable accommodation, affirmative action, or both?  57 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1045 (2000).

Shelley D. Cutts, Coment. The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988: and incomplete solution to the problem of housing discrimination against families. 30 Ariz. St. L. J. 205 (1998).

Susan B. Eisner, There's no place like home: housing discrimination against disabled persons and the concept of reasonable accommodation under the Fair Housing Amendment Act of 1988. 14 N.Y. L. Sch. J. Hum. Rts. 435 (1998).

John P. Herrion, Developments in housing law and reasonable accommodations for New York City residents with disabilities.  27 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1295 (2000).

Paul Homes Masters, Note. Group homes in the family's backyard (City of Edmonds v. Oxford House, 115 S. Ct. 1776, 1995.) 11 BYU J. Pub. L. 141 (1997).

Frederic White Outing the madman:  fair housing for the mentally handicapped and their right to privacy versus the landlord's duty to warn and protect.  28 Fordham Urb. L.J. 783 (2001).

Frederic White, Outing the madman*: fair housing for the mentally handicapped and their right to privacy versus the landlord's duty to warn and protect.  10 J. Affordable Housing & Commun. Dev. L. 372 (2001).
 

Insurance
 

Thomas D. Flanigan, Note. Assisted reproductive technologies and insurance under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.  38 Brandeis L.J. 777 (2000).

Jennifer S. Geetter, The condition dilemma: a new approach to insurance coverage of disabilities.  37 Harv. J. on Legis. 521 2000 ().

Lori Bloch Izzo, Note.  The ADA does not regulate the content of insurance policies, but what have cameras, Braille books or wheelchairs got to do with it? (Doe v. Mutual of Omaha, 179 F.3d 557, 7th Cir. 1999.)  7 Conn. Ins. L.J. 263 (2000).

Christopher Aaron Jones, Legislative "Subterfuge"?: Failing to insure persons with mental illness under the Mental Health Parity Act and The Americans with Disabilities Act. 50 Vand. L. Rev. 753 (1997).

Nancy R. Mansfield, Elizabeth T. Baer, & Leonard J. Hope, Insurance caps on AIDS- related healthcare costs: will the ADA fill the gap created by ERISA? 14 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 601 (1998).

Christine Nardi, Comment. When health insurers deny coverage for breast reconstructive surgery: gender meets disability. 1997 Wis. L. Rev. 777 (1997).

Richard C. Parks, Case note.  The Seventh Circuit eviscerates the ADA's protection of people with HIV/AIDS against insurance policy distrimination.  (Doe v.Mutual of Omaha, 999 F. Supp. 1188, N.D. Ill. 1998.)   10 Law & Sexuality: Rev. Lesbian Gay Bisexual & Transgender Legal Issues 277 (2001).

Andrea K. Short, Eradicating discrimiation amoung individuals with disabilities: parity in employer-provided, long-term disability benefit plans. 56 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1341 (1999).

Grant P.H. Shuman, Comment.  Escaping the purpose of the ADA: the "safe-harbor: " provision and disability-bases distinctions in insurance policies and programs.  36 Gonz. L. Rev. 549 (2001).

Luke A. Sobota, Comment. Does Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act regulate insurance? 66 U. Chi. L. Rev. 243 (1999).
 

International
 
 

Rodrigo Jimenez, The Americans with Disabilities Act and its impact on international and Latin-American law.  52 ALA. L. Rev. 419 (2000).

Arlene Kanter and Kristin Dadey, The right to asylum for people with disabilities.  73 Temp. L. Rev. 1117 (2000).

Jennifer Kern, Across boundaries: the emergence of an international movement of women with disabilities. 8 Hastings. Women's L. J. 233 (1998).

Marc Lim, Comment. The first step forward--the AIDS Dismissal Case and the protection against AIDS-based employment discrimination in Japan. 7 Pac. Rim L. & Pol'y J. 451 (1998).
 

Learning Disabilities
 

Jeff Brown, A learning-disabled lawyer's perspective: a response to "lowering the bar" integrity, stereotypical attitudes and reasonable accommodations.  42 S. Tex L. Rev. 129 (2000).

David B. Goldstein, Ethical implications of the learning-disabled lawyer.  42 S. Tex. L. Rev. 111 (2000).

Sharona Hoffman, ADA obligations of employers  42 S. Tex. L. Rev. 59 (2000).

Freedley Hunsicker, Learning disabilities, law schools and the lowering of the bar.  42 S. Tex. L. Rev. 19 (2000).

R. Randall Kelso, Reflections on the Learning-disabled lawyer: or on the importance of being swift - a modest proposal  42 S. Tex. L. Rev. 119 (2000).

Scott Lemond & David Mizgala, Identifying and accommodating the learning-disabled lawyer.  42 S. Tex. L. Rev. 69 (2000).

Leah B. Lipskar Comment.  Learning disabilities and the ADA: a guide for successful learning disabled students considering a career in the law.  3 U. Pa. J. Lab. & Emp. L. 647 (2001).

Laura E. Naistadt, Understanding learning disabilities.  42 S. Tex. L. Rev. 97 (2000).

Donald H. Stone, What law schools are doing to accommodate students with learning disabilities  42 ?????19 (2000).

W. Ray Williams, Hand-up or handout?  The Americans with Disabilities Act and "unreasonable accommodation" of learning disabled bar applicants: toward a new paradigm.  34 Creighton L. Rev. 611 (2001).

Medical

Evan G. DeRenzo, Robert R. Conley, & Raymond Love, Assessment of capacity to give consent to research participation: state-of-the-art and beyond. 1 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 66 (1998).

Mental Health

Symposium on mental disability law. Articles by Michael L. Perlin, Susan Stefan, Melinda Bird, Keri K. Gould, Rowan K. Klein, Saul J. Faerstein, M.D., Jan C. Costello. James W. Ellis, James Preis, Stephen H. Behnke, Elyn R. Saks and David C. Stone, M.D. 31 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 775 (1998).

Kristi D. Aalberg, Note.  An act concerning physical restraints of persons with disabilities: a legislative note on Connecticut's recent ban of the use of life-threatening restraints on the mentally ill.  4 Quinnipiac Health L.J. 211 (2001).

Alison McChrystal Barnes, Competency, coercion, and risk of violence: legal intersects with fundamental issues of mental health. 82 Marq. L. Rev. 713 (1999).

Kelly R. Becton, The Americans with Disabilities Act should not impair the regulation of the legal profession where mental health is an issue. 49 Okla. L. Rev. 353 (1996).

Stephen Behnke & Elyn R. Saks, Therapeutic jurisprudence: informed consent as a clinical indication for the chronically suicidal patient with borderline personality disorder. 31 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 945 (1998).

Steven J. Cleveland, Note. Sterilization of the mentally disabled: applying error cost analysis to the "best interest" inquiry. 86 Geo. L. J. 137 (1997).

Robert T. Drapkin, Protecting the rights of the mentally disabled in administrative proceedings. 39 Cath. Law 317 (2000).

Hilary Duke, Note. The narrowing of state bar examiner inquiries into the mental health of bar applicants: bar examiner objectives are met better through attorney education, rehabilitation, and discipline. 11 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 101 (1997).

Tami A. Earnhart, Note. Medicated mental impairments under the ADA: diagnosing the problem, prescribing the solution. 74 Ind. L.J. 251 (1998).

Nancy Lee Firak, Threshold barriers to Title I and Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act: discrimination against mental illness in long-term disability benefits. 12 J.L. & Health 205 (1997).

Thomas F. Geraghty and Louis J. Krasu, Treating the mentally-ill offender: the challenges of creating an effective, safe and just system (Reviewing Treatment of Offenders with Mental Disorders, edited by Robert M. Wettstein.). J. Crim. L. & Criminology 89 393 (1998).

Michael Leonard Goff Jr., Note.  Protecting our mentally ill: a critique of the role of Indiana state courts in protecting involuntarily committed mental patients' right to refuse medication.  76 Ind. L.J. 983 (2001).

Ann Hubbard, The ADA, the workplace, and the myth of the "dangerous mentally ill".  34 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 849 (2001).

Susan Kerr, The application of the Americans with Disabilities Act to the termination of the parental rights of individuals with mental disabilities.  16 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 387 (2000).

Peggy R. Mastroianni & Carol R. Miaskoff, Coverage of psychiatric disorders under the Americans with Disabilities Act. 42 Vill. L. Rev. 723 (1997).

Mindy McPheeters, Psychiatric disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Kan. J. L & Pub. Pol'y 189 (1999).

Robert D.Miller, The continuum of coercion: consititutional and clinical considerations in the treatment of mentallly disordered persons. 74 Denv. U. L. Rev. 1169 (1997).

Michael L. Perlin, "Where the winds hit heavy on the borderline": mental disability law, theory and practice, "us" and "them." 31 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 775 (1998).

James Preis, Advocacy for the mental health needs of children in California. 31 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 937 (1998).

Dennis P. Saccuzzo, Legal regulation of behavior modification for developmentally disabled and other handicapped persons. 25 Ohio N. Univ. L. Rev. 27 (1999).

Elyn R. Saks, Mental health law: three scholarly traditions.  74 S. Cal. L. Rev. 295 (2000).

Susan Stefan, The Americans with Disabilities Act and mental health law: issues for the twenty-first century. 10 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 131 (1999).

T. Howard Stone, Therapeutic implications of incarceration for persons with severe mental disorders: searching for rational health policy. 24 Am. J. Crim. L. 283 (1997).

Illissa L. Watnik, A constitutional analysis of Kendra's law: New York's solution for treatment of the chronically mentally ill.  149 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1181 (2001).

Maxine Aldridge White, Mental health and the law: two perspectives. 82 Marq. L. Rev. 723 (1999).

Roederick C. White, Sr., What right to privacy? The risk to the voluntary mental health patient as a result of Louisiana's current forcible medication statute. 24 S.U. L. Rev. 1 (1996).

Bruce J. Winick, Coercion and mental health treatment. 74 Denv. U. L. Rev 1145 (1997).

Nursing Home/For-Profit Providers

Julie A. Braun & Elizabeth A. Capezuti, A medico-legal evaluation of dehydration and malnutrition among nursing home residents. 2000 Elder L.J. 239 (2000).

Elizabeth K. Schneider, The ADA--a little used tool to remedy nursing home discrimination. 28 U. Tol. L. Rev. 489 (1997).

Prisons

Emily Alexander, The Americans with Disabilities Act and state prisons: a question of statutory interpretation. 66 Fordham L. Rev. 2233 (1998).

Christopher J. Burke, Winning the battle, losing the war?: judicial scrutiny of prisoners' statutory claims under The American With Disabilities Law 98 Mich. L. Rev. 482 (1999).

Ryan M. Debski, Recent decision.  Civil rights--Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990--prohibition of public entity discrimination against qualified individual with a disability--application to inmates in state prisons. (Pa. Dep't of Corrections v.Yeskey, 118 S. Ct. 1952, 1998.)  37 Duq L. Rev. 659 (1999).

Saul J. Faerstein, Sexually dangerous predators and post-prison commitment laws. 31 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 895 (1998).

Susan B. Hoppe, Comment. Broad statutory language is not ambiguous: the Americans with Disabilities Act applies in state prisons. 15 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 275 (1998).

Jennifer L. Lange, Note: Biting the hand that feeds them--state prisons and the ADA: responding to..(Amos v. Maryland Dep't of Pub. Safety & Correctional Servx., 126 F. 3rd 589, 4th Cir. 1997.). 1998 BYU L. Rev 875 (1998).